In a regular second appeal concerning a suit for permanent injunction regarding illegal encroachment, the single-judge High Court of Punjab and Haryana found no ground for interference with the lower courts' concurrent findings of facts and dismissed the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
128
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Regular Second Appeal No. 641 of 2021 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 15.09.2021
Raghvir Singh alias Balbir Singh and Others
… Appellant(s)
Versus
Ram Dass
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Naveen Batra, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
2
Regular Second Appeal No. 641 of 2021 (O&M)
error or perversity in the findings of facts.
disposed of.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge
September 15, 2021 “DK”
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2021.09.15 16:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the concurrent findings of facts by the lower courts regarding illegal encroachment were erroneous or perverse warranting interference in the second appeal.
Raghvir Singh alias Balbir Singh and Others
Ram Dass
Anil Kshetarpal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
