Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arun Monga dismissed the writ petition, holding that dismissal does not authorize the competent authority to keep renewal applications pending indefinitely. Orders must reflect reasons for rejection.
Petition dismissed; no specific relief granted to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
102
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-7944-2021
Date of Decision:08.04.2021
Sadhu Ram ...Petitioner
Versus State of Haryana and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: - Mr.S.S. Duhan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
(Presence has been marked through video conferencing)
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
No grounds to interfere. However, dismissal of this petition shall not be construed to mean that the competent authority is to keep the renewal application pending in perpetuity. It is expected of it to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, giving reasons for rejection, if any.
Disposed of accordingly.
(ARUN MONGA) 08.04.2021 JUDGE ����� Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.04.11 10:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether dismissal of the writ petition implies the competent authority can keep the renewal application pending indefinitely without passing orders with reasons.
Sadhu Ram
State of Haryana
another
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
