This Court dismissed a Constitutional Writ Petition after it was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to pursue remedies pending before the Lok Adalat. The order contained no substantive reasoning or disposal of leading legal principles.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
130 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.7220 of 2021 Date of decision-27.4.2021
Poonam
...Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
( Through Video-Conferencing)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present: Mr. Vivek Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, AAG, Haryana.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner be allowed to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue the remedy which she has already availed before the Lok Adalat and is pending consideration with the said authority at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE
27.04.2021 geeta
| Whether speaking/reasoned : | Yes | No |
|---|---|---|
| Whether Reportable : | Yes | No |
GEETA RANI 2021.04.27 16:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Poonam
State of Haryana
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
