CWP withdrawn. The High Court dismissed the petitioner's constitutional writ petition after the counsel prayed for its withdrawal with liberty to pursue alternative remedies.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
118
(Proceedings through V.C.)
CWP No.4634 of 2021 Date of decision: 28.09.2021
Jitender Kumar and another
..Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present: Mr. Ashok Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Tanisha Peshawaria, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for the withdrawal of the
writ petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy in accordance with law.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty afore-said.
( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) JUDGE
28.09.2021 ( MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA ) neetu JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
NEETU RANI 2021.09.28 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC
Jitender Kumar and another
State of Haryana and others
Augustine George Masih
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
