The writ petition was disposed of as having become infructuous because an Arbitrator had already been appointed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
216
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-3082-2021 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.03.2021
Gagandeep
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Union of India and others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN
Present: Mr. N.S. Gill, Advocate for
Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sunil Kumar Sharma for respondent nos.1, 3 and 4.
Mr. R.S. Madan, Advocate for respondent No.2-NHAI.
ALKA SARIN, J. (ORAL)
Heard through physical hearing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition has become infructuous inasmuch as an Arbitrator has already been appointed.
Disposed off as having been rendered infructuous.
( ALKA SARIN ) 22.03.2021 JUDGE Yogesh Sharma
NOTE: Whether speaking/non-speaking: Speaking Whether reportable: YES/NO
YOGESH SHARMA 2021.03.22 19:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gagandeep
Union of India
Alka Sarin
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
