Dismissed

Surender Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC22 Nov 2021CWP/23553/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged orders declining his request to join duty due to termination on grounds of fake matriculation certificate. The High Court held such factual disputes not amenable to writ jurisdiction, dismissing the petition with liberty to seek alternative remedies.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed with liberty to approach alternative remedy as available.

Surender Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Others — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

123 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CWP-23553-2021 Date of Decision: 22.11.2021

SURENDER KUMAR

...Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

¶7

…Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

¶9

Present : Mr. Raman Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, D.A.G., Haryana.

¶11

(Presence marked through video conference)

¶12

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

¶13

Petition herein is for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari setting aside/quashing order dated 08.03.2021 (Annexure P-7) passed by respondent No.2 and order dated 18.12.2019 (Annexure P-6) passed by respondent No.3, vide which, the request of the petitioner to join the duty has been declined as he was terminated from the post of Driver in Haryana Roadways on the ground of finding his matriculation certificate as a fake document.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that upon issuance of a show cause notice to the petitioner on 15.11.2018, alleging that his caste certificate and matriculation certificate are not genuine, he appeared before the competent authority and proved his case but subsequently, his contract was terminated vide order dated 07.12.2018 (Annexure P4) passed by the General Manager, Haryana State Transport, Bhiwani.

¶15

VANDANA 2021.11.30 05:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

Learned State counsel, on advance service, joins proceedings and submits that the said issue has been decided by passing a well-reasoned speaking order dated 18.12.2019 (Annexure P-6), stating therein, that the certificate issued by the School Board from where the petitioner has passed Class X, is not genuine and hence, his contract was terminated.

¶17

Heard.

¶18

Dispute herein is with regard to the genuineness of a certificate, which vide impugned order has been held to be fake. Given the disputed nature of facts involved herein, the same cannot be adjudicated under the extra-ordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court.

¶19

Dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to seek his alternative remedy as may be available to him and if, so advised.

¶20

November 22, 2021		(ARUN MONGA)
gurpreet		JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned:	Yes
Whether reportable:	No

¶21

VANDANA 2021.11.30 05:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Surender Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surender Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohit Vs State of Haryana and Others

Ashwani Kumar Vs Surjit Kaur and Others

Subhash Soni Vs State of Haryana and Others

M/S I World Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Arvind Sahni

M/S I World Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Sanjeev Sahni

Ashwani Kumar and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Another