Disposed

Rekha v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC3 Nov 2021CWP/22290/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order disposed of a writ petition seeking appointment of the petitioner as a nominee for her late husband's government job. The court directed the competent authority to decide on a pending representation within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the competent authority to decide the pending representation regarding appointment of the petitioner as a nominee within three months.

Rekha Vs State of Haryana and Others — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

129

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CWP-22290-2021

¶4

Date of Decision: 03.11.2021

REKHA

…Petitioner

Versus

STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

¶9

…Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA

¶11

Present : Mr. Jasdev Singh Thind, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, D.A.G., Haryana.

¶13

(Presence marked through video conference).

¶14

ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)

¶15

Petitioner herein, inter alia , seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider her claim for appointment in place of her late husband Parveen, who was working as a part time worker in the office of respondent No.3 and died in harness on 30.09.2013.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that qua her aforesaid grievance, petitioner submitted a representation dated 09.09.2016 (Annexure P-3), but to no avail. Hence, the instant petition.

¶17

Learned State counsel, on advance service, joins proceedings and states that competent authority shall take appropriate decision on the pending representation dated 09.09.2016 (Annexure P-3).

¶18

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner also agrees that let a final decision is taken, either way, by the competent authority on the pending representation dated 09.09.2016 (Annexure P-3), giving reasons thereof.

¶19

SHALINI BHATIA 2021.11.03 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶20

Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek return by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required.

¶21

Without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent authority to look into the grievance of the petitioner as per representation dated 09.09.2016 (Annexure P-3) and also by keeping in view the contention raised in the present petition by treating the same as supplementary representation and take a decision, in accordance with law.

¶22

Let the needful be done within a period of 03 months from today. If a favorable order is passed, benefit thereof be accorded within 30 days thereafter.

¶23

8. Disposed of accordingly.

¶24

November 03, 2021 (ARUN MONGA) gurpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

¶25

SHALINI BHATIA 2021.11.03 18:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Rekha v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rekha v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surender Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Yogesh Rolan and Others Vs State of Haryana and Others

Jasvir Singh Vs State of Haryana and Others

Yogit Vs State of Haryana and Others

Krishan Lal Vs State of Haryana and Others

Geeta Vs State of Haryana and Others