The petitioner prayed for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one alleging violation of statute by the Wakf Board. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed with liberty to file a fresh one.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
108
(Proceedings through V.C.)
CWP No.18961 of 2021 Date of decision: 22.09.2021
Parminder Khan
..Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, prays for the withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action by referring to and mentioning the relevant provisions of the statute, which according to the petitioner has been violated by the Wakf Board while leasing out the land for the purposes of residential and commercial use.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty afore-said.
( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) JUDGE
22.09.2021 ( MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA ) neetu JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable No
NEETU RANI 2021.09.22 16:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document PHHC
Parminder Khan
State of Punjab
Augustine George Masih
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
