Dismissed

Puja Roadlines v. Managing Director,the Haryana State Federation of Consumer Co-Operative and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC24 Aug 2021CWP/16302/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition filed by Puja Roadlines was dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue a representation dated 23.06.2021 before the respondent authorities.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed to withdraw writ petition with liberty to pursue representation dated 23.06.2021 before respondent authorities.

Puja Roadlines Vs Managing Director,the… — Writ and Judicial Review | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CWP-16302-2021 (O&M) Date of decision:- 24.08.2021

Puja Roadlines

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

Managing Director, The Haryana State Federation of Consumer Cooperative Whole Sales Store Ltd. (CONFED), Panchkula and others.

¶7

...Respondent(s)

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI SHANKER JHA, CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

¶9

Present: Mr. Robin Dutt, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶10

Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 to 3.

¶11

(The aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencing since the proceedings are being conducted in virtual Court)

¶12

¶13

RAVI SHANKER JHA, C.J. (ORAL)

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue the objection/representation dated 23.06.2021 (Annexure P-3) before the respondent-authorities.

¶15

Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

¶16

Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 1 to 3 submits that the objection/representation dated 23.06.2021 (Annexure P-3) shall be considered and decided by the authorities in accordance with law expeditiously.

¶17

It goes without saying that we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and, therefore, the authorities would be at liberty to examine the matter keeping all facts and facets into consideration and thereafter accept or reject the same in accordance with law.

¶18

(RAVI SHANKER JHA) CHIEF JUSTICE

¶19

(ARUN PALLI) JUDGE

¶20

24.08.2021

¶21

Amodh

¶22

Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes/No
Whether reportable	Yes/No

¶23

AMODH SHARMA 2021.08.26 15:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Puja Roadlines v. Managing Director,the Haryana State Federation of Consumer Co-Operative and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Puja Roadlines v. Managing Director,the Haryana State Federation of Consumer Co-Operative and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajiv Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Yashoda Lather and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Rosmetra Technologies Limited Vs Ut of Chandigarh and Anr.

Ecogreen Engery Gurgaon Faridabad Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Ecogreen Energy Gurgaon Faridabad Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Haryana and Others

M/S Selvel Media Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Municipal Corporation Panchkula and Anr.