Dismissed

Ram Phal v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC26 Jul 2021CWP/13558/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction to decide a long-pending appeal against his termination order due to disqualification based on an invalid B.Ed. degree. The court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondent to decide the appeal within three months, including its maintainability.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to decide the pending appeal filed by him within three months, including the question of its maintainability.

Ram Phal Vs State of Haryana and Others — Service and Employment | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

CWP-13558-2021

¶2

-1-

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

¶4

117

¶5

Civil Writ Petition No.13558 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision: July 26, 2021

¶6

Ram Phal

¶7

..........Petitioner.

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

State of Haryana and others

¶10

........Respondents.

¶11

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. S. SANDHAWALIA

¶12

Present: Mr. Arvind Galav, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶13

(The proceedings are being conducted through video conferencing, as per instructions)

¶14

¶15

G.S. SANDHAWALIA, J.(Oral)

¶16

By filing the present civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks an innocuous prayer to direct respondent No.2 to consider and decide the appeal dated 01.06.2018 (Annexure P-12) which was filed by him against the termination order dated 22.02.2018 (Annexure P-10) passed by respondent No.4.

¶17

Notice of motion.

¶18

Mr. Harish Nain, A.A.G. Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents.

¶19

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, since the petitioner's services as a Guest Teacher have been dispensed with on the ground that petitioner has qualification of B.Ed. from Inderprast University, SACHIN MEHTA 2021.07.26 18:07 Delhi, which on verification was found to be invalid, the termination order I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

¶20

CWP-13558-2021

¶21

-2-

¶22

(Annexure P-10) was passed accordingly.

¶23

Perusal of paper book would show that a voluminous appeal (Annexure P-12) had been filed by the petitioner before respondent No.2, which is pending for the last more than three years. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with direction to said respondent to decide the appeal including the question of its maintainability, filed by the petitioner within a period of three months on receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶24

In case, the relief is not liable to be granted on account of any legal impediment, a reasoned order be passed and communicated to the petitioner.

¶25

( G. S. SANDHAWALIA ) July 26, 2021 JUDGE Sachin M. Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶26

SACHIN MEHTA 2021.07.26 18:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document High Court, Chandigarh

Ram Phal v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Phal v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivraj Singh and Another Vs Jagjit Singh and Others

Sandeep Kaur Vs Guru Nanak Dev University and Anr.

Jatinder Kaur and Others Vs Guru Nanak Dev University and Another

Bagga Singh and Others Vs Pargat Singh and Ors.

Ravinder Kumar and Others Vs State of Haryana and Another

Kultar Singh Vs Pepsu Road Transport Corporation