Oral order allowing withdrawal of a writ petition by the petitioner with liberty to approach authorities via a comprehensive representation regarding the cutting of trees.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a comprehensive representation to the relevant authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (PROCEEDINGS THROUGH V.C.)
CWP-13284 of 2021 Date of Decision: 22.07.2021
Gursewak Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA
Present:- Mr. Munish Gulati, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL)
Counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time prays for withdrawal of the writ petition to approach the authorities by filing a comprehensive representation detailing therein the exact land whereby trees were situated and was shamlat, which have been cut by the private respondents without taking any proper permission from any authorities including gram panchayat.
Disposed of as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(Augustine George Masih) Judge
(Ashok Kumar Verma) July 22, 2021 Judge R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned
Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2021.07.22 12:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gursewak Singh
State of Punjab
Augustine George Masih
Ashok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
