The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition declaring it infructuous due to a prior Division Bench judgment, with liberty to seek administrative remedy.
Liberty granted to seek remedy before the administrative authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No. 208 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.1025-2019 Date of decision: 15.11.2021
Kamal and another …Petitioners
Versus Haryana Staff Selection Commission ..Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present: Mr. Jasbir Mor, Advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Rajni Gupta, Additional A.G., Haryana **. *****
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that instant petition is rendered infructuous in view of the Division Bench judgment rendered in LPA No.1332 of 2019.
Petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to seek their remedy before the administrative authority interms of the Division Bench Judgment, ibid.
15.11.2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
ASGAR ALI 2021.11.16 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
LPA No.1332 of 2019Referred¶9
Kamal and another
Haryana Staff Selection Commission
Arun Monga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
