Dismissed

Shivani v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC4 Mar 2021CRWP/856/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This oral order is a criminal writ petition wherein the petitioner sought directions for protection of life and liberty and restraint from harassment. Upon perusal of the verification report filed by the State confirming no objection from private respondents to the petitioner's residence, the petition was not pressed and was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as not pressed following the State's verification report indicating no objection from private respondents.

Shivani Vs State of Haryana… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

218

¶3

CRWP-856-2021 Decided on : 04.03.2021

¶4

Shivani

¶5

. . . Petitioner(s) Versus

¶6

State of Haryana and others

¶7

. . . Respondent(s)

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL

¶9

(Through Video Conferencing)

¶10

PRESENT: Mr. Amit Maan, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

¶11

Mr. Rajiv Goel, DAG, Haryana. ****

¶12

MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (Oral)

¶13

Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3, to provide protection of life and liberty to the petitioner and restrain respondents No.4 to 7 not to harass and intimidate the petitioner in any manner against her wishes on living under the shelter of Maha Singh (respondent No.8) and further restraining respondents No.2 & 3 from registering any false criminal case against respondent NO.8 and his family at the instance of private respondents.

¶14

In compliance to the order dated 29^th January, 2021, verification report by way of affidavit of Shamsher Singh, HPS, DSP, Meham, District Rohtak, on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, has been filed in the registry. Same is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. A perusal of the same reveals that the statements of the petitioner and respondents No.4 to 6 have been recorded and annexed as Anexures R-1, R-

¶15

JAWALA RAM 2021.03.04 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

¶16

CRWP-856-2021 - 2 -

¶17

3 to R-5 along with the verification report, wherein, petitioner in her statement has stated that she would like to continue living with Sachin S/o Maha Singh (respondent No.8) R/o Meham. The private respondents in their statements have also stated that they have no objection if the petitioner lives with Sachin S/o Maha Singh.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of the verification report submitted by the State and the statements recorded of the parties (petitioner and private respondents), which have been annexed along with the verification report, he would not want press the present petition.

¶19

Dismissed as not pressed.

¶20

(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE

¶21

March 04, 2021

¶22

J.Ram

¶23

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

¶24

JAWALA RAM 2021.03.04 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh

Shivani v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivani v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mastu Khan Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Sahil Jain Vs State of Punjab and Others

Sahil Singh Vs State of Punjab

Gunwantveer Singh Vs State of Punjab

Lala Ram Vs State of Haryana

Sukhjinder Singh Vs State of Haryana