Sahil Khan @ Dilshad v. State of Haryana and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged denial of emergency parole. Counsel requested withdrawal; petition disposed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the order.
Petitioner challenged denial of emergency parole. Counsel requested withdrawal; petition disposed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(PROCEEDINGS THROUGH V.C.)
CRWP-7072 of 2021 Date of Decision: 02.08.2021
Sahil Khan @ Dilshad
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA
Present:- Mr. Ravinder Bangar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Tanish Peshawaria, DAG, Haryana.
AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the State has placed on record an order passed by the Deputy Superintendent, District Jail, Karnal, dated 17.05.2021 according to which the request of the petitioner for grant of emergency parole stands declined.
Counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty to challenge the said order.
Disposed of as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(Augustine George Masih) Judge
August 02, 2021 R.S.
(Ashok Kumar Verma) Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No
RAVINDER SINGH 2021.08.02 15:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Sahil Khan @ Dilshad
State of Haryana
Augustine George Masih
Ashok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court