A writ petition was disposed of on the ground that it has become infructuous, as no threat to the lives or liberty of the petitioners was established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRWP-658-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 1.10.2021
Muskan and another … Petitioners
Versus
U.T. Chandigarh and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Sumit Jain, APP, U.T. Chandigarh.
(Proceedings conducted through video conferencing)
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners do not have any threat as regards their lives and liberty.
The learned State counsel has also submits that statements of the petitioners have also been recorded to this effect.
In view of the aforestated position, the petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
| 1.10.2021 mohan |
(GURVIN | DER SINGH GILL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
MOHAN SINGH 2021.10.01 15:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Muskan and another
U.T. Chandigarh and others
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
