Disposed

Saiyam Jindal and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Punjab & Haryana HC25 Jun 2021CRWP/5847/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition for protection from family threats, the High Court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police to assess the threat perception and take necessary action. The court clarified that this order does not validate the marriage or affect civil/criminal liability. The case was disposed via video conferencing.

What did the court decide?

Director to S.S.P. Patiala to assess threat perception and take needful action if warranted.

Saiyam Jindal and Anr. Vs Stat… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

CRWP No. 5847 of of 2021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRWP No. 5847 of of 2021 DATE OF DECISION :- June 25, 2021

¶5

Saiyam Jindal and another

¶6

...Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Punjab and others

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN

¶11

Present :- Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶12

¶13

The case has been taken up through Video Conferencing.

¶14

It is stated that petitioner No.1 – Saiyam Jindal, aged about 24 years has got married with petitioner No.2 – Ruby Jindal, aged about 34 years against wishes of his family members, arrayed as respondents No. 4 to 8, who are threatening to interfere in their marital life, as such to seek protection in that regard, they have approached this Court by way of filing the present petition. It is further stated that the petitioners had submitted a written representation to respondent No.2 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala dated 11.06.2021 seeking protection, copy of the same being Annexure P-7 without evoking any response so far.

¶15

Notice of motion.

¶16

Mr. J.S. Ghumman, DAG, Punjab has accepted notice on behalf

¶17

of State of Punjab.

¶18

The petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2 – Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, to look into the representation Annexure P-7, assess threat perception to the petitioners and if he finds that some PARVINDER SINGH 2021.06.25 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

CRWP No. 5847 of of 2021

¶20

¶21

action in the matter is warranted, then the needful be done in accordance with law. However, this order shall not validate the marriage between the petitioners and shall not have any effect on any civil or criminal action to which the petitioners may be found liable, under the law.

¶22

(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE June 25, 2021 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No

¶23

PARVINDER SINGH 2021.06.25 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Saiyam Jindal and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saiyam Jindal and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basant Singh Vs State of Punjab

Anamika and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Nisha and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Priyanka Rani and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Anju and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Tulsi and Anr. Vs Ut Chandigarh and Others