Disposed

Sarita Alias Sadarbi and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC6 May 2021CRWP/4316/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the petition seeking protection of life and liberty for petitioners married against family wishes. The single judge, without commenting on marriage validity, directed the respondent authority to decide the pending representation within one week and grant protection if a threat to liberty is perceived.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation within one week and grant protection if threat to life and liberty is perceived.

Sarita Alias Sadarbi and Another Vs State… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

-1-

¶2

CRWP No.4316 of 2021 (O&M)

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRWP No.4316 of 2021 (O&M) Date of Decision.06.05.2021 (HEARD THROUGH VC)

¶5

Sarita @ Sadarbi and another

¶6

...Petitioners

¶7

¶8

State of Haryana and others ...Respondents

¶9

CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR

¶10

Present: Mr. Prashant Singh Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶11

-.-

¶12

JAISHREE THAKUR J. (ORAL)

¶13

The petitioners claim themselves to be major. They have pleaded that they have married against the wishes of respondents No.4 to 8 and seek protection to their life and liberty. They apprehend danger from respondents No.4 to 8. They have placed on record marriage certificate (Annexure P-4) evidencing their marriage. The petitioners have also submitted a representation dated 26.04.2021 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.2 but no action has been taken so far.

¶14

Notice of motion to official respondents only.

¶15

Ms. Deepshikha Chauhan, AAG, Haryana, who is present through the medium of video conferencing, accepts notice for the official respondents. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply a copy of complete paper book to the counsel appearing for the State via e-mail during the course of the day.

¶16

Without commenting on the validity of the marriage allegedly performed by the petitioners and entering upon an exercise to evaluate the

¶17

PANKAJ KUMAR 2021.05.06 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶18

-2-

¶19

CRWP No.4316 of 2021 (O&M)

¶20

evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of this petition with direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-5) within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any committed by them.

¶21

(JAISHREE THAKUR) JUDGE

¶22

May 06, 2021 Pankaj*

¶23

Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No

¶24

PANKAJ KUMAR 2021.05.06 11:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Sarita Alias Sadarbi and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sarita Alias Sadarbi and Another v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarweshwar Dass Vs State of Haryana and Others

Raj Kumar Vs State of Punjab and Others

Kuldeep Vs State of Haryana

Virender Vs State of Haryana

Ruchi Kumari and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Manpreet Kaur and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.