Petitioner filed under Article 226 seeking direction to release detenu in illegal custody. Court held writ petition infructuous due to change in circumstance.
The writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.2109 of 2019 Date of decision:28.07.2021
Manish
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present:Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana.
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
The Court has been convened through video conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.
Instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus directing respondents No.1 to 4 to release the detenues mentioned in para 4 of the petition, who are in illegal custody of respondents No.5 and 6.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become
infructuous.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE
| July 28, 2021 savita |
|
|---|---|
| Whether Speaking/Reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
SAVITA KADIAN 2021.07.29 10:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition for issue of writ of habeas corpus has become infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manish
State of Haryana
Suvir Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
