Petitioners requested withdrawal of the criminal revision petition due to resolution of the dispute. The court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
Permitted withdrawal of the petition and dismissed the matter as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.No.232 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No.1474 of 2020 Date of Decision:27.07.2021 Nisha and another .....Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others .....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present:Mr. Puneet Kakkar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Garg, AAG, Haryana.
H.S. MADAAN, J.
The case has been taken up through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that since the dispute
between the petitioners and the private respondents has been resolved amicably, the petitioners do not want to proceed further with the present petition and have instructed him to withdraw the present petition, therefore, he be allowed to do so. He is permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
July 27, 2021 ( H.S. MADAAN ) renu JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
RENU 2021.07.28 03:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh
Nisha and another
State of Haryana and others
H.S. MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
