Disposed

Avinash and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC17 Dec 2021CRWP/11919/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought writ for protection of life and liberty due to threats following marriage against respondents' wishes. Court directed the Commissioner of Police to examine a specific representation for protection if genuine threat exists.

What did the court decide?

Directed respondent No.2, Commissioner of Police, Amritsar, to look into representation Annexure P-6 and take appropriate action if petitioners genuinely deserve protection.

Avinash and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others — Punjab & Haryana HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

Sr.No.125

¶3

CRWP No.11919 of 2021 Date of Decision: 17.12.2021

Avinash and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Punjab and others ...Respondents

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA

¶9

Present: Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶10

¶11

MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (ORAL)

¶12

By way of the instant petition, both the petitioners seek the indulgence of this Court for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents No.1 to 3 to protect their lives and liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of respondents No.4 to 6 because they (petitioners) have solemnized their marriage against the wishes of these respondents. It has also been mentioned in this petition that a representation (Annexure P-6) has already been moved to respondent No.2 in this regard.

¶13

Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only.

¶14

Ms. Samina Dhir, learned Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who has appeared on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 in this case in pursuance of the copies of the present petition having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, accepts the notice on behalf of these respondents.

¶15

NEETU RANI 2021.12.17 16:50 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC

¶16

CRWP No.11919 of 2021

-2-

......

Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioners restricts his prayer to the issuance of a direction to respondent No.2 to look into and take appropriate action on the said representation of petitioner No.2, i.e. Annexure P-6.

¶21

Learned State counsel has no objection for the same.

¶22

Keeping in view the above-discussed limited prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting or expressing any opinion on the legality and validity of the marriage as stated to have been solemnized between the petitioners, respondent No.2-Commissioner of Police, Amritsar, is hereby directed to look into the said representation (Annexure P-6) of petitioner No.2 and if it is found that the petitioners genuinely deserve any protection, then to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

¶23

This petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶24

		(MEENAK	SHI I. MEHTA)
17.12.2021			JUDGE
neetu
	Whether speaking/reasoned	Yes
	Whether Reportable	No

¶25

NEETU RANI 2021.12.17 16:50 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC

Avinash and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Avinash and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sahil Vs State of Punjab

Rubina Akhter and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Vipin Kumar Vs State of Haryana and Another

Jaspreet Kaur and Another Vs State of Punjab and Others

Lakshay Birla and Anr. Vs State of Haryana and Others

Payal and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.