Petition seeking anticipatory bail dismissed as petitioners were not interested in further prosecution.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP No. 1174 of 2020 DATE OF DECISION :- July 06, 2021
Jyoti and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- None for the petitioners.
Mr. J.S. Ghuman, DAG, Punjab. ***
The case has been taken up through Video Conferencing.
Learned State counsel on instructions from ASI Rajesh Kumar states that statements of petitioners have been recorded by the local police in which they have stated that they do not apprehend danger to their lives and liberty at the hands of private respondents No. 4 to 12.
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in further prosecution of the petition, therefore, the same stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE
July 06, 2021 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2021.07.06 16:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jyoti and another
State of Punjab and others
H.S. Madaan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
