The petitioner requested withdrawal of the writ petition after stating the girl was traced and resides with the petitioner. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-11043-2020
Date of Decision: 18.01.2021
Kaushalya Devi
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Present : Mr. Gautam Kaile, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Harpreet Singh Multani, AAG, Punjab.
Through Video Conferencing
JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral)
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the girl has been traced and now, she is residing with the petitioner and therefore, he does not wish to press the present petition and he may be permitted to withdraw the same.
In view of the above statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
18.01.2021 adhikari
(JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2021.01.21 11:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Kaushalya Devi
State of Punjab
Jasgurpreet Singh Puri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
