Petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file afresh after recording statements of witnesses. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn at that stage, granting the requested liberty.
Withdrawal of petition allowed with liberty to file afresh after recording statements.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-8520-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:-19.3.2021
Satnam Singh
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. A.S.Jawandha, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab assisted by ASI Jagjit Singh.
Mr. Tanvir S. Grewal, Advocate for the complainant.
(proceedings conducted through video conferencing)
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)
Today, at the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition at this stage with liberty to file afresh after statements of some material prosecution witnesses have been recorded.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the petition is dismissed as
withdrawn at this stage with liberty aforesaid.
| 19.3.2021 | (Gurvinder Singh Gill) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| kamal | Judge | ||
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes | / No | |
| Whether Reportable | Yes | / No |
KAMAL KUMAR 2021.03.19 18:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to permit withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file afresh after recording of statements.
Satnam Singh
State of Punjab
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
