Dismissed

Jaspreet Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC24 Feb 2021CRM-M/8388/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court held that a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable challenging an order declaring an accused a proclaimed offender. Such a matter must be raised before the court that issued the proclamation. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, and the petitioner was directed to surrender and apply for regular bail.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed; Petitioner directed to surrender in trial court within 15 days and apply for regular bail.

Jaspreet Singh Vs State of Punjab and… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

CRM-M- 8388 of 2021 -1-

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶3

CRM-M- 8388 of 2021 (O&M) Date of decision : 24.2.2021

¶4

Jaspreet Singh

¶5

................Petitioner

¶6

vs.

¶7

State of Punjab and another

¶8

.................Respondents

¶9

Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Madaan

¶10

Present: Mr. Rajesh Bhatheja, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶11

H. S. Madaan, J. (Oral)

¶12

Case taken up through video conferencing.

¶13

Petitioner – Jaspreet Singh, who has been declared as a proclaimed offender in FIR No. 89 dated 29.7.2016, for offence under Section 498-A IPC, registered at Police Station Ajitwal, District Moga, has approached this Court by way of filing the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking quashing of the said order.

¶14

In authority reported as Mehnga Singh vs. State of Punjab 2002 (2) RCR (Criminal) 501 , by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, wherein dealing with a similar situation, where the accused had been declared as proclaimed offender and a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging that order had been filed in this court, it was

¶15

BANITA CHUGH 2021.02.24 13:32 I agree to specified portions of this document

¶16

CRM-M- 8388 of 2021 -2-

¶17

observed that when an accused has been declared as proclaimed offender, a petition against the order under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable and that the accused should first move the Court which declared him proclaimed offender and even an objection against validity of proclamation is required to be raised in the first instance before the Court which issued the proclamation and that power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is not to be exercised in favour of a person who is absconder or avoiding service.

¶18

Furthermore, in view of the the Apex Court authorities State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Pradeep Sharma 2014 (2) RCR (Criminal) 269 and Lavesh vs. State (NCT of Delhi) 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 240, a proclaimed offender being absconder, in terms of Section 82 Cr.P.C., is not entitled to the discretionary relief of prearrest bail.

¶19

Therefore, the petition stands dismissed.

¶20

The petitioner is directed to surrender in the trial Court within a period of 15 days and move an application for regular bail, explaining all the facts and circumstances to the said Court. Since it is stated that the matter has been compromised between the parties, the trial Court may decide the application for regular bail, so moved by the petitioner, expeditiously, considering the fact that the matter between the spouses has statedly been resolved amicably.

¶21

( H.S. Madaan ) 24.2.2021 Judge chugh Whether speaking / reasoned Yes / No Whether reportable Yes / No

¶22

BANITA CHUGH 2021.02.24 13:32 I agree to specified portions of this document

Jaspreet Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaspreet Singh v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamalpreet Singh Vs Harpreet Kaur and Anr.

Abhishek Mangal Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Hasam Vs State of Haryana

Ritu Vs State of Haryana and Others

Tamana and Another Vs State of Haryana and Others

Rajni Devi Vs State of Haryana and Others