Kavita were married to two brothers and no complaint was ever made prior to 17.05.2020 by either of them or their family before anyone about the alleged mental and physical harassment meted out to them for getting insufficient dowry. He further submits that had there been any grain of truth, the father of the deceased would have definitely made some reference qua the same while getting his statement recorded vide Annexure P-1, which he admittedly did not. It has been further contended that it was only on 22.06.2020, that for the first time, while lodging the FIR the complainant i.e. mother of the deceased levelled allegations of mental and physical harassment against the petitioner and his family and also alleged that her other daughter Kavita on account of being intimidated by the accused did not speak up soon after the occurrence in question that in fact the deceased had been forcibly administered poison. While referring to the postmortem report, which has been placed on record today, learned counsel has submitted that had it been a case of alleged forcible administration of poison, there would have been some resistance put up by the deceased and which in turn would have been reflected in the postmortem report. He has submitted that in the said report, doctor had specifically noticed that there was no external injury found on the person of the deceased. Still further, he has submitted that on 25.10.2020, the complainant party lodged FIR No.707 dated 25.10.2020 under Sections 406, 498-A, 506 and 34 IPC registered at Police Station Shivaji Colony District Rohtak wherein allegations were levelled against the petitioner and his family of subjecting the sister of the deceased to mental and physical harassment which on investigation were found to be without any substance and all
