Allowed

Mahender Singh and Another v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC15 Sept 2021CRM-M/5877/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge court accepted a petition for anticipatory bail made by Mahender Singh and another. The court converted prior interim directions into absolute bail, allowing the petitioners to remain on bail while joining the investigation, noting that custodial interrogation was not required.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; interim directions made absolute; petitioners granted bail subject to joining investigation and abiding by Section 438(2) conditions.

Mahender Singh and Another Vs State of Haryana — Cheating and Forgery | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

CRM-M-5877-2020

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

CRM-M-5877-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 15.09.2021

¶5

Mahender Singh and another

...Petitioners

Versus

State of Haryana

...Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

¶11

Present: Mr. Aman Pal, Advocate, for the petitioners.

¶12

Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana assisted by SI Kashmir Singh.

¶13

(proceedings conducted through video conferencing)

¶14

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)

¶15

The petitioners have approached this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in respect of a case registered against them vide FIR No.299 dated 30.05.2019 at Police Station City Sohna, District Gurugram, under Sections 406/409/420/467/468/471/120-B IPC.

¶16

At the time of issuance of notice of motion on 11.02.2020, the following order was passed:

¶17

“Briefly the allegations putforth in case FIR bearing No. 299 dated 30.05.2019, registered under Sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC at Police Station City Sohna, District Gurugram are to the effect that there was misuse of funds of Municipal Committee with regard to hiring of tractor trolley for picking garbage on higher rates, forgery of the quotations and use of inferior quality of material in construction of a temporary helipad. The allegations pertain to the year 2010. The petitioners No. 1 and 2 are stated to be working as Municipal Engineer and Junior Engineer, respectively. It has been stated that entire works have been

¶18

VANDANA YADAV 2021.09.16 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶19

CRM-M-5877-2020

¶20

¶21

carried out after passing of resolution by the Municipal Committee and the petitioners were only required to supervise the work as approved by the Municipal Committee. Furthermore, Roshni Devi, the President of Municipal Committee who has also been arrayed as an accused has been granted pre-arrest bail vide order dated 22.10.2019 passed in CRM-M-27483-2019.

¶22

Notice of motion for 21.4.2020.

¶23

Meanwhile, the petitioners shall join the investigation and would come present as and when called for and in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be admitted to interim bail on their furnishing personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting/Investigating Officer. The petitioners shall also abide by the conditions as specified under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.”

¶24

Learned State counsel upon instructions has informed that pursuant to interim directions issued by this Court, both the petitioners have since joined investigation and that their custodial interrogation is not required.

¶25

Having regard to the nature of allegations and the fact that the petitioners have joined investigation and are not stated to be required for any custodial interrogation, the petition is accepted and the interim directions issued by this Court vide order dated 11.02.2020 are hereby made absolute subject to the condition that the petitioners shall join investigation as and when called upon to do so and cooperate with the Investigating Officer and shall also abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C.

¶26

15.09.2021		(GURVI	NDER SINGH GILL)
VY			JUDGE
	Whether speaking/reasoned:	Yes/No
	Whether reportable:	Yes/No

¶27

VANDANA YADAV 2021.09.16 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Mahender Singh and Another v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahender Singh and Another v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pardeep Saini Vs State of Punjab

Naresh Kumar Vs State of Haryana

Lakhwinder Singh @ Lakha Vs State of Punjab

Kuldeep and Others Vs State of Haryana

Angrej Singh @ Doctor Vs State of Punjab

Manga Singh Vs State of Punjab