Allowed

Randhir Singh v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Sept 2021CRM-M/52712/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving cheating and forgery, subject to cooperation with the investigation and compliance with statutory conditions. The actual opinion on merits was expressed as withheld.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner directed to join investigation and shall be released on bail if sought to be arrested.

Randhir Singh Vs State of Haryana — Cheating and Forgery | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

�� 

¶2

��

¶3

�� !"��#"$%&%�'�(��

��

��

��

��( ��)���+��+��+��*

¶8

�,"&"'! �� !�� !��!��"� ��

¶9

¶10

��+��+��-��**

¶11

�� Through this petition, the petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 124 dated 09.09.2019 registered under Sections 420, 452 and 506 IPC (Section 452 and 506 have been deleted later) at Police Station Panjokhra, District Ambala.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner purchased a plot from Veer Parkash in the name of his wife- Rajesh Rani and constructed one room, shop and a bathroom. The petitioner borrowed the money from Gauri Shankar-father of the complainant and in lieu of that pledged 45 square yards of said plot in the favour of the complainant-Ankit Aggarwal.

¶13

Learned counsel for the complainant states neither the money has been returned by the petitioner nor the complainant is in possession of the plot.

¶14

RAJEEV PUROHIT 2021.10.01 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶15

�� 

¶16

$�� "��%��$� � ��&"�� petitioner is only required to appear at the time of presentation of the challan.

¶17

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶18

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the present case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court finds merit in this petition and the same is allowed. The petitioner is directed to join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and if he is sought to be arrested, he shall be released on anticipatory bail to the satisfaction of Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions as envisaged in Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

It is made clear that if pursuant to and in compliance with this order, the petitioner does not cooperate with the investigating agency, the investigating agency would be liberty to move an appropriate application for cancellation of bail.

¶20

�� �� .��+��+��/��** ��'��( ��

¶21

)���� +��,� )��& � +��*,�

¶22

RAJEEV PUROHIT 2021.10.01 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Randhir Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Randhir Singh v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Pardeep Deswal Vs State of Haryana and Another

Wasim Vs State of Haryana

Bittu Singh Vs State of Punjab

Rajesh Devi Vs State of Haryana

Harinderpal Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Rich Pal Vs State of Haryana and Another