Petitioner withdrew the bail petition seeking regular bail in case involving offences under NDPS Act, Arms Act, and IPC. Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
209
CRM-M-51987 of 2021 Date of decision:20.12.2021
Sukhbir @ Bhutiya
... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present:Mr. Keshav Pratap Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Deepshikha Chauhan, AAG, Haryana.
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
This is the second petition seeking grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.169 dated 21.04.2020, registered under Section 21(C) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959 and Sections 188, 269 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, at Police Station City Tohana, District Fatehabad (Annexure P-1). The first petition (CRM-M-7822 of 2021) was dismissed, after arguments on 27.10.2021.
After arguing for sometime, counsel for the petitioner seeks and
is granted permission to withdraw the petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
| December 20, 2021 savita |
(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE |
|---|---|
| Whether Speaking/Reasoned | Yes/No |
| Whether Reportable | Yes/No |
SAVITA KADIAN 2021.12.20 16:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
Sukhbir @ Bhutiya
State of Haryana
Suvir Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
