Disposed

Bismillah v. State of Haryana and Others

Punjab & Haryana HC13 Dec 2021CRM-M/51832/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order disposing of an petition under Section 482 CrPC without examining allegations. Directed Superintendent of Police, Nuh to examine the petitioner's representation filed on the threat to her safety and lack of investigation.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Superintendent of Police, Nuh to examine the petitioner's representation dated 30.10.2021 and take suitable action.

Bismillah Vs State of Haryana and Others — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶2

CRM-M-51832-2021 (O&M) Date of decision-13.12.2021

Bismillah

...Petitioner

Vs.

State of Haryana and others

¶7

...Respondents

¶8

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

¶9

Present: Ms. Rosi, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶10

¶11

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)

¶12

Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking issuance of direction to the respondents to conduct fair and unbiased investigation in case bearing FIR No.35 dated 21.10.2021 lodged for offence under Sections 341, 354-A, 354-B and 506 IPC at Women Police Station Mewat, District Nuh (Anexure P-1) and has sought further direction to the official respondents to protect her life and liberty as well as that of her family from the hands of accused.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner submits that due to an unsavory incident which took place on 7.10.2021, the petitioner lodged the FIR (Annexure P-1), however, the official respondents are not investigating into the allegations levelled in the FIR, rather some of the co-villagers, who have been impleaded as private respondents No.6 and 7 have been threatening the petitioner to withdraw the case and are forcing her to enter into a

¶14

GEETA RANI 2021.12.14 14:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶15

CRM-M-51832-2021 (O&M)

¶16

--2--

¶17

compromise. Counsel submits that the petitioner apprehends a threat to her and her family’s safety and she has submitted a representation dated 30.10.2021 (Annexure P-2) to the Superintendent of Police, District Nuh, which is not being attended to. Counsel submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to the concerned official respondent to look into the same.

¶18

Request of the counsel has been considered.

¶19

Without examining the allegations levelled in the petition or in the representation (Annexure P-2), petition is disposed of with a direction to Superintendent of Police, Nuh-respondent No.3 to examine the representation (Anneure P-2) and take suitable action thereon as warranted in accordance with law.

¶20

A copy of this order as well as representation (Annexure P-2) be sent to respondent No.3 in order to enable him to do the needful expeditiously.

¶21

(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE

¶22

13.12.2021

¶23

geeta

¶24

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No

¶25

GEETA RANI 2021.12.14 14:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Bismillah v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bismillah v. State of Haryana and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gagan Singh Alias Gaggu Vs State of Punjab

Simranjit Singh Alias Simmi Vs State of Punjab

Amandeep Kaur Vs State of Punjab and Others

Waheed and Anr. Vs State of Haryana

Sachin @ Yogi Vs State of Haryana

Satpal Singh @ Yashpal Vs State of Punjab