Allowed

Chanchal Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC26 Jul 2021CRM-M/51330/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Convened via video conference due to the pandemic, the Court allowed a petition making interim bail granted on 03.12.2019 in an FIR regarding hurt, assault and criminal intimidation absolute, subject to standard bail conditions after the State submitted that the petitioners had joined the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail granted on 03.12.2019 is made absolute subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Chanchal Singh and Anr. Vs State of Punjab — Anticipatory Bail | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

CRM-M-51330 of 2019

¶2

{1}

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶4

202-1

¶5

CRM-M-51330 of 2019 Date of decision:26.07.2021

¶6

Chanchal Singh and another

¶7

... Petitioners

¶8

Vs.

¶9

State of Punjab ... Respondent

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL

¶11

Present:Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate for the petitioners.

¶12

Mr. H.S.Multani, AAG, Punjab.

¶13

SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)

¶14

The Court has been convened through video conferencing due to Covid-19 pandemic.

¶15

On 03.12.2019, following order was passed:-

¶16

“Petitioners pray for grant of pre-arrest bail in FIR No.167

¶17

dated 1.11.2019 registered under Sections 323, 324, 341, 382, 506, 148, 149 IPC at Police Station Kamboj, District Amritsar Rural.

¶18

Sh.Amit Sharma, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the first informant/injured.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioner

¶20

SAVITA KADIAN 2021.07.26 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶21

CRM-M-51330 of 2019

¶22

{2}

¶23

No.1 also suffered injuries including two on the head but the investigating agency has not registered any counter case. He further submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case.

¶24

Notice of motion.

¶25

On the asking of Court, Mr. Hittan Nehra, Addl. AG, Punjab who is present in Court accepts notice on behalf of the State of Punjab and prays for time to seek instructions.

¶26

Let a copy of the petition be supplied to the learned counsel for the State during the course of the day.

¶27

Adjourned to 10.1.2020.

¶28

In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on interim bail subject to furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting/ Investigating Officer.However, the petitioners shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.”

¶29

Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Surjit Singh

¶30

submits that the petitioners have joined investigation and are no longer required for custodial interrogation. He has further instructions to submit that the petitioners are not involved in any other criminal case.

¶31

In view of the above facts, but without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is allowed and the order dated

¶32

SAVITA KADIAN 2021.07.26 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

¶33

CRM-M-51330 of 2019

¶34

{3}

¶35

03.12.2019 granting interim bail to the petitioners is made absolute, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶36

(SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE

¶37

July 26, 2021 savita
Whether Speaking/Reasoned	Yes/No
Whether Reportable	Yes/No

¶38

SAVITA KADIAN 2021.07.26 17:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh

Chanchal Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chanchal Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjit Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Mandeep Kaur Vs State of Punjab

Hardeep Kumar Vs State of Punjab

Satish Alias Bobby Vs State of Haryana and Others

Sangram Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab

Chand Khan Vs State of Haryana