Naveen Gupta v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
CRM-M-51015-2021 -1- 111 IN THE HIGH COURT…
CRM-M-51015-2021 -1- 111 IN THE HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRM-43405-2021 in / and CRM-M-51015-2021
-1-
111
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-43405-2021 in / and CRM-M-51015-2021 Date of decision: 22.12.2021
Naveen Gupta
Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present: Mr. Sidhant Vermani, Advocate for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
****
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):
[1] Today physical hearing was held but on request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the matter is taken up by way of hybrid hearing.
[2] CRM-43405-2021 is filed seeking preponement and withdrawal of main petition with liberty to approach the Sessions Judge concerned.
[4] Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab appearing on advance notice accepts the same. He has no objection if the prayer of the applicant is allowed.
PANKAJ BAWEJA 2021.12.23 03:30 I attest to the accuracy of this document High Court, Chandigarh
-2-
CRM-43405-2021 in / and CRM-M-51015-2021
allowed and date of hearing in the main petition is preponed to today itself.
[7] Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE
22nd December, 2021 ������������� 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No 2. Whether reportable : Yes /No
PANKAJ BAWEJA 2021.12.23 03:30 I attest to the accuracy of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Naveen Gupta
State of Punjab
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court