Sanjeevan Alias Kokla v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought interim bail under Cr.P.C. s. 439 to join his niece's marriage due to her father's death. Charges include IPC 302, 120-B, and Arms Act s. 25. Judgment text ends without delivering the final disposal order.
What the court decided
���� IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-49010 of 2021 Date of Decision: November 22, 2021
Sanjeevan @ Kokla
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana …Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Present: - Mr. Sandeep Lather, Advocate for the petitioner.
Amol Rattan Singh, J. (Oral)
By this petition, filed under the provisions of Section 439 of the Cr.P.C, the petitioner seeks interim bail to join his niece ( Bhanji) marriage for two days, with FIR no.707, dated 01.09.2014, having been registered at Police Station City Jind, District Jind, alleging therein the commission of offences punishable under Sections 302, 120-B of the IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be granted interim bail to attend his niece's marriage ceremony.
Whether the death of the niece's father necessitates the petitioner's presence at the upcoming wedding.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sanjeevan @ Kokla
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
Amol Rattan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/49010/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court