Allowed

Gurpreet Singh @ Gopi and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Another

Punjab & Haryana HC20 Aug 2021CRM-M/4763/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash an FIR based on a genuine compromise between parties, with consent from the complainant and no objection from the State.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.267 dated 04.10.2020 and subsequent proceedings were quashed qua the petitioners on the basis of the compromise, subject to payment of Rs.15,000/- costs.

Gurpreet Singh @ Gopi and Ors. Vs… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

CRM-25475-2021 in/and

¶2

-1-

¶3

CRM-M-4763-2021

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

¶5

CRM-25475-2021 in/and CRM-M-4763-2021 Date of decision: - 20.08.2021

¶6

Gurpreet Singh @ Gopi and others

¶7

....Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State of Punjab and another

¶10

.....Respondents

¶11

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI

¶12

Present:Mr. Prateek Pandit, Advocate, for the applicants-petitioners.

¶13

Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

¶14

Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Rampal, Advocate for non-applicant/respondent No.2.

¶15

( Through Video Conferencing )

¶16

********

¶17

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (ORAL)

¶18

CRM-25475-2021

¶19

Present application has been filed for preponing the hearing

¶20

of the main CRM-M-4763-2021, which now stands adjourned to 24.11.2021.

¶21

Notice of the application.

¶22

Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who

¶23

has joined the proceedings through video conference, keeping in view the service of advance copy of application, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State.

¶24

NARESH KUMAR 2021.08.20 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶25

CRM-25475-2021 in/and CRM-M-4763-2021

¶26

-2-

¶27

Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. Nitin Rampal, Advocate, who has also joined the proceedings through video conference, keeping in view the service of advance copy of application, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2.

¶28

Learned counsels for the non-applicants/respondents raises no objection for preponement of hearing of main petition i.e. CRM-M-4763-2021, as being prayed by the applicants-petitioners.

¶29

In view of the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, the present application is allowed and the hearing of main petition i.e. CRM-M-4763-2021 is preponed from 24.11.2021 to today.

¶30

CRM-M-4763-2021

¶31

Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing of FIR No.267 dated 04.10.2020 under Sections 323, 324, 326, 341 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Kapurthala District Kapurthala, on the basis of the compromise, which has been entered into between the parties.

¶32

While allowing the CRM-3763-2021, the Coordinate Bench of this Court had passed the following order:-

¶33

“Prayer in this application is for issuance of a direction to the parties for recording of their statement before the trial Court/Illaqua Magistrate in support of the compromise.

¶34

Notice of the application.

¶35

Mr. Joginder Pal Ratra, DAG, Punjab and Mr. Nitin Rampal, Advocate, who are also appearing through video conferencing, accept notice of the application on behalf of the respondent-State and respondent No. 2/complainant, respectively.

¶36

Learned counsel for respondent No. 2 admits to the factum of compromise entered into between the parties.

¶37

NARESH KUMAR 2021.08.20 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶38

CRM-25475-2021 in/and CRM-M-4763-2021

¶39

-3-

¶40

Accordingly, the present application is allowed and the parties are directed to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording of their statements with regard to compromise/settlement within a period of 30 days from today.

¶41

The trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to submit a report on or before the next date of hearing containing the following information:

¶42

Number of persons arrayed as accused in FIR,

¶43

Whether any accused is proclaimed offender,

¶44

Whether the compromise is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence,

¶45

Whether the accused persons are involved in any other FIR or not.

¶46

The trial Court is also directed to record the statement of the Investigating Officer as to how many victims/complainants are there in the FIR.”

¶47

A report has come from Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class,

¶48

Kapurthala, addressed to the Registrar General of this Court dated 16.03.2021, along with the statements of the accused-petitioners as well as the complainant, which have been recorded. As per the said report, the compromise between the parties is genuine, voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence and none of the accused has been declared as proclaimed offender and no other criminal proceedings are pending against them.

¶49

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the parties have already entered into compromise so as to live peacefully and no useful purpose will be served in keeping the FIR alive.

¶50

Learned counsel for respondent No.2-complainant admits the compromise as well as the statements made before the Judicial Magistrate

¶51

NARESH KUMAR 2021.08.20 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶52

CRM-25475-2021 in/and CRM-M-4763-2021

¶53

-4-

¶54

1^st Class, Kapurthala and does not raise any objection, in case the FIR in question is quashed on the basis of the compromise.

¶55

Learned State counsel has also not pointed out any objection in respect of the prayer of the parties for quashing the FIR on the basis of the compromise.

¶56

Keeping in view the totality of the circumstances, which have been mentioned hereinbefore and that the parties have already entered into compromise to settle their dispute so as to live peacefully and none of the accused is a proclaimed offender and there are no other criminal cases against the accused-petitioners, this Court is inclined to accept the prayer of the petitioners for quashing the FIR on the basis of the compromise.

¶57

Thus, FIR No.267 dated 04.10.2020 under Sections 323, 324, 326, 341 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Kotwali, Kapurthala District Kapurthala and all other subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed qua the petitioners on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties.

¶58

The above order, quashing of the FIR, will be subject to the payment of Rs.15,000/- as costs, to be deposited with Prabh Asra, Bank Account No.014894600000970, Yes Bank Branch, SCO 151/152, Sector 9-C, Chandigarh by the petitioners.

¶59

( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) August 20, 2021 JUDGE naresh.k

¶60

Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes Whether reportable? No

¶61

NARESH KUMAR 2021.08.20 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Gurpreet Singh @ Gopi and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurpreet Singh @ Gopi and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Emeka Anado Vs State of Punjab

Neeraj Bhatia Vs State of Haryana

Harwinder Singh Modh. Vs State of Punjab and Others

Sanya Gupta Vs State of Punjab and Others

Kulwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab

Jagjeet Singh Vs State of Haryana