Partly allowed

Salwinder Singh v. State of Punjab

Punjab & Haryana HC29 Sept 2021CRM-M/44373/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

An appeal against anticipatory bail was dismissed for the petitioner's failure to join the investigation despite a final opportunity. However, considering the petitioner is aged 73, the court granted one week to file for regular bail after surrender.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to surrender within 10 days and file for regular bail, which the Trial Court must decide within one week.

Salwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab — Bail and Remand | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh

¶2

CRM-M-44373-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 29.9.2021

¶3

Salwinder Singh … Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab

... Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

¶8

Present:Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Ajay Pal Singh Gill, DAG, Punjab, assisted by ASI Inderjit Singh.

¶10

(Proceedings conducted through video conferencing)

¶11

¶12

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)

¶13

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking grant of anticipatory bail in a case registered vide FIR No.92, dated 7.9.2019, Police Station Bhikhiwind, District Tarn Taran, under Sections 506, 353, 186, 323, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act.

¶14

At the time of issuance of notice of motion on 18.10.2019, the petitioner had been directed to join investigation. However, when the matter was taken up again on 13.8.2021 i.e. after almost 2 years, the State counsel informed that he has not joined investigation. However, while taking a lenient view in the mater, a last opportunity

¶15

MOHAN SINGH 2021.09.30 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

CRM-M-44373-2019 (O&M)

¶17

- 2 -

¶18

was afforded to the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer on 8.9.2021 and the matter was adjourned to 29.9.2021 i.e. today.

¶19

Learned State counsel has informed that even despite the last opportunity afforded to the petitioner on the last date, he has not joined investigation.

¶20

In view of the aforestated position, this Court does not find any ground for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The petition, as such, is dismissed.

¶21

However, since the petitioner is stated to be aged about 73 years as on date, it is ordered that in case, the petitioner surrenders before the trial Court within a period of 10 days from today and moves an application for grant of regular bail, the learned trial Court shall endeavour to dispose of the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of three days from filing of such application, but in any case not later than one week from filing of such application.

¶22

29.9.2021 ( GURVINDER SINGH GILL) mohan JUDGE Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No

¶23

MOHAN SINGH 2021.09.30 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Salwinder Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salwinder Singh v. State of Punjab

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhvinder Singh @ Shoki Vs State of Haryana and Others

Bijender Saini Vs State of Haryana

Inderjeet Yadav Vs State of Haryana

Maninder Pal Singh Vs State of Punjab

Than Singh @ Thanedar Vs State of Haryana

Sarvesh Mathur Vs State of Haryana and Another