Oral order allowing preponement of a hearing date and permitting withdrawal of a criminal defamation petition, dismissing the main petition on withdrawal.
Preponement of hearing allowed; withdrawal of main petition allowed; main petition dismissed for withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.123
CRM Nos.39866-39867 of 2021 in CRM-M No.4216 of 2021 Date of Decision: 24.11.2021
Amit
...Applicant-Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present: Mr. Chanderhas Yadav and Ms. Shubreet Saron, Advocates for the applicant-petitioner.
MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA, J. (ORAL)
CRM No.39866 of 2021
This application has been moved for seeking the preponement of the date of hearing in the main petition bearing CRM-M No.4216 of 2021 from 10.01.2022 to some earlier date.
Notice in this application.
Mr. Apoorv Garg, learned Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, who has appeared in this case in pursuance of the copy of the present application having been sent to the respondent-State in advance, accepts the notice and submits that he has no objection in allowing the instant application.
Keeping in view the above-said fact as well as the reasons as mentioned in this application, the same is allowed and the afore-mentioned main petition is taken on the Board today itself.
NEETU RANI 2021.11.24 16:36 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC
CRM Nos.39866-39867 of 2021 in CRM-M No.4216 of 2021 -2-
.....
CRM No.39867 of 2021
This application has been moved for seeking permission to withdraw the afore-mentioned main petition.
Notice in the application.
At the asking of the Court, learned State counsel accepts the
notice and submits that he has no objection in the withdrawal of the said main petition.
Keeping in view the above-said fact as well as the reasons as mentioned in the application, the same is allowed as prayed for.
CRM-M No.4216 of 2021
Dismissed for having been withdrawn as prayed for in the CRM No.39867 of 2021.
| 24.11.2021 | (MEENA | KSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| neetu | |||
| Whether speaking/reasoned | Yes | ||
| Whether Reportable | No |
NEETU RANI 2021.11.24 16:36 I attest to the accuracy of this order PHHC
State of Haryana
Neetu Rani
Meenakshi I. Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
