Petitioner challenged proceedings where she was deemed an accused. Court noted finding of earlier inquiry was corroborated; concluded petitioner is not an accused and petition was rendered infructuous.
The petition was declared infructuous and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-41997 of 2020 Date of Decision: 15.01.2021
Padmesh Kumari
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and Ors.
.....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. R.S. Bajaj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sarabjit Singh, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. P.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for the complainant.
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J
In the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent-State of Punjab, it has been stated that in the second inquiry, finding of the earlier inquiry has been corroborated and as such the petitioner is not an accused in this case.
Accordingly, present petition is rendered infructuous and the
same is disposed of as such.
January 15, 2021 manoj
(Harinder Singh Sidhu) Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2021.01.16 13:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Padmesh Kumari
State of Punjab
Harinder Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
