Petitioner approached High Court for pre-arrest bail for the first instance without approaching Sessions Court. Court held remedy lies only with Sessions Court and disposed of petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-41008 of 2019 DATE OF DECISION :- July 20, 2021
Gurpreet Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- Mr. K.B. Raheja, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. J.S. Ghuman, DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Puneet Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the complainant.
The case has been taken up through Video Conferencing.
A perusal of the files goes to show that petitioner accused has approached this Court for grant of pre-arrest bail without approaching the Court of Sessions seeking that relief at the first instance.
Under the circumstances, the petitioner is relegated to the remedy of approaching the Court of Sessions first. With such observations, the present petition stands disposed of.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE
July 20, 2021 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2021.07.20 16:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Gurpreet Singh
State of Punjab
H.S. MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
