Allowed

Ashish v. State of Haryana

Punjab & Haryana HC12 Jan 2021CRM-M/395/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to the petitioner, a first offender charged under the NDPS Act for possession of charas. The court noted that the challan stood presented and the petitioner had already been detained for over two months.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Ashish Vs State of Haryana — Narcotics (NDPS) | Punjab & Haryana HC (2021)

¶1

In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh

¶2

CRM-M-395-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 12.1.2021

Ashish … Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana

... Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

¶8

Present:Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner.

¶9

Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana, assisted by SI Wazir Singh.

¶10

(Proceedings conducted through video conferencing)

¶11

¶12

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)

¶13

The petitioner seeks grant of regular bail in respect of a case registered against him vide FIR No.234, dated 31.10.2020, Police Station Rajaund, District Kaithal, under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act.

¶14

It is alleged in the FIR that the petitioner was caught red handed while in possession of 500 grams of ‘Charas’.

¶15

PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.01.12 20:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

¶16

- 2 - CRM-M-395-2021 (O&M)

¶17

It is not disputed that challan already stands presented and that the petitioner is not involved in any other case and that the petitioner as on date has been behind bars since the last more than two months.

¶18

Having regard to the aforestated factual position wherein the petitioner is alleged to be a first offender and has already been behind bars since the last more than 2 months, further detention of the petitioner will not serve any useful purpose especially since challan already stands presented. The petition, as such, is accepted and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.

¶19

January mohan	12, 2021	(GURVIN	DER SINGH GILL) JUDGE
	Whether speaking /reasoned	Yes / No
	Whether Reportable	Yes / No

¶20

PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.01.12 20:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

Ashish v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashish v. State of Haryana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harwinder Singh Vs State of Punjab

Maghar Singh Vs State of Punjab and Others

Hardeep Singh Vs State of Punjab

Asha Vs State of Haryana

Neveen Vs State of Haryana

Damanpreet Singh and Others Vs State of Punjab and Another