Anil @ Chila v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew bail petition; disposed by permission.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Petitioner withdrew bail petition; disposed by permission.
Permission granted to withdraw petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-3725 of 2021 DATE OF DECISION :- July 12, 2021
Anil @ Chila
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present :- Mr. B.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Garg, AAG, Haryana.
The case has been taken up through Video Conferencing.
After arguing for some time and realizing that the Court was not agreeing with his contentions and was not inclined to grant the relief of regular bail to the petitioner in view of the fact that the petitioner is said to be involved in 16 other criminal cases of which he has been convicted in several cases, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he be permitted to withdraw the present petition.
Permission is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(H.S. MADAAN) JUDGE
July 12, 2021 p.singh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No
PARVINDER SINGH 2021.07.13 15:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Anil @ Chila
State of Haryana
H.S. MADAAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court