Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition before the Court showed its disinclination to interfere. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Disposal of petition by withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No.202
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-33860-2021 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.12.2021
Lalit …Petitioner
Vs. State of Haryana …Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Present : Mr. R.S.Mamli, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Saurabh Mohunta, DAG, Haryana.
ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL)
After arguing for some time, when this Court showed its disinclination to interfere,learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for.
09.12.2021 (ARUN MONGA) vandana JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
SHALINI BHATIA 2021.12.13 02:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Lalit
State of Haryana
ARUN MONGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
