Dinesh v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-2917-2021 Date of Decision: 19.04.2021
Dinesh
... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present: Mr. Vishal Rattan Lamba, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Apoorv Garg, DAG, Haryana.
HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J.(Oral)
Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the present
petition has become infructuous as the petitioner has been acquitted of the charges by the trial Court. The factum of acquittal of the petitioner has also been mentioned in the copy of status report already supplied to the learned counsel.
Disposed of having become infructuous.
19.04.2021 �������������������������� ������������� ���������� Note: �������������������������� ���������������� ������������������� � ������
PARVEEN KUMAR 2021.04.20 00:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Dinesh
State of Haryana
HARNARESH SINGH GILL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court