The court granted the petition for regular bail for the petitioner, who has been in custody for over nine months. The court reasoned that further detention without a commenced trial serves no useful purpose.
Petition accepted and the petitioner ordered to be released on regular bail upon furnishing bail/surety bonds as per the joint charge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In The High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-23491-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 12.10.2021
Deepak Kundu .... Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Abhinay Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Nevedita, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG, Haryana, assisted by ASI Narinder.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J . (Oral)
MOHAN SINGH 2021.10.12 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
- 2 - CRM-M-23491-2021 (O&M)
MOHAN SINGH 2021.10.12 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-23491-2021 (O&M)
- 3 -
the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty
Magistrate concerned.
| 12.10.2021 Mohan |
(GURVIN | DER SINGH GILL) JUDGE |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether speaking /reasoned | Yes / No | ||
| Whether Reportable | Yes / No |
MOHAN SINGH 2021.10.12 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for regular bail in a case related to computer data manipulation and forgery charges.
Whether further detention of the petitioner will serve any useful purpose given the substantial period spent in custody and lack of trial commencement.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Kundu
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
