Parnav Mehta v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-18336-2021(O&M) Date of Decision: 11.06.2021
Parnav Mehta
.... Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. Anmol Rattan Singh Sidhu, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pratham Sethi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S.Khaira, AAG, Punjab.
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that in view of the
petitioner having been found innocent by the SIT, present petition has become infructuous.
Disposed of as infructuous.
June 11, 2021 manoj
(Harinder Singh Sidhu) Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2021.06.11 19:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Parnav Mehta
State of Punjab
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court