The petitioner submitted that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. The High Court, without detailed reasoning, dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
212
CRM-M-18195-2021 Decided on : 19.05.2021
Ajay Kumar
. . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
(Through Video Conferencing)
PRESENT: Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Luvinder Sofat, AAG, Punjab.
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (Oral)
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous, therefore, the same may be disposed of as such.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE
May 19, 2021 J.Ram Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JAWALA RAM 2021.05.19 16:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Ajay Kumar
State of Punjab
Manjarì Nehrù Kaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
