A bail petition filed under Section 438 CrPC vide of regular prayer for withdrawal was allowed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana as the petitioner withdrew the same after the Bench was not inclined to extend bail concession.
Withdrawal of the bail petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
203
CRM-M-1748-2021 Decided on : 08.04.2021
Sukhwinder Singh @ Sukh
. . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL
(Through Video Conferencing)
PRESENT: Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Sidakmeet Singh Sandhu, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the complainant.
MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (Oral)
After arguing for some time, when the Bench was not inclined with the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and also to extend the concession of regular bail, he prays for withdrawal of the instant petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE
April 08, 2021
J.Ram
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
JAWALA RAM 2021.04.08 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh
Sukhwinder Singh @ Sukh
State of Punjab
Manjari Nehru Kaul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
