Ranjit Singh v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana…
Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana At Chandigarh
CRM-M-17361-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision:-26.10.2021
Ranjit Singh … Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana.
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J .(Oral)
Today, at the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the instant petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has since been expired.
In view of the aforestated position, the instant petition filed under provisions of Section 439 Cr.P.C. is disposed off having been rendered redundant.
26.10.2021 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill ) pankaj Judge Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
PANKAJ KAKKAR 2021.10.26 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Ranjit Singh
State of Haryana
Gurvinder Singh Gill
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court