Coordinate bench dismissed a bail petition for petitioner no.2 because he failed to join the investigation, noting the matter is already disposed of for petitioners no.1 and 3.
Petition for custody bail dismissed for petitioner no.2 due to failure to join investigation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
��� ���������������������������������������� �������������
�CRM-M-14581-2021 ����������������������������
��������������
����������������
���
���������������� ���������������
��������������������������������������������
�������� ������������������������
��������� �������������!�"��#$"��������
�������������������������� !
%& ��������������" ��������������������' ������������������ (�����������&����)(���������������������������������*+,�-����-�"������./�����+0" ����������������"������!��������!�������������)���������������))���"��������� 1�)�����������)"��))�!��!���������������22���������������������������)������� ���������������������������+�+3+�33�,3�*0��������/�-�45�������������+�6���� *6���������/�-7�
After the order passed on April 01, 2021, (admitting the petitioners to interim bail if they were sought to be arrested upon them joining investigation), on 29.07.2021 it was recorded by this court (coordinate bench), that petitioners no.1 and 3 having joined investigation their custodial interrogation was not required as per the investigating officer; and consequently, the order admitting them to interim bail was made absolute.
As regards petitioner no.2, Honey alias Shiva, he was stated to have not joined investigation and consequently he was again directed to do so in terms of the earlier order passed.
DHARAM VIR 2021.11.12 02:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
�CRM-M-14581-2021
-2-
Today, counsel for the petitioners has not come present, with learned State counsel submitting that, as per his instructions from ASI Kuldeep Singh, petitioner no.2 has still not joined investigation.
That being so, the petition qua petitioners no.1 and 3 already having been allowed on 29.07.2021, as regards petitioner no.2 it is dismissed.
�"#$%&$��'������' ������������������! dharamvir JUDGE
�8�����������'��!3�����������9:� ��8���������������)����� �����;
DHARAM VIR 2021.11.12 02:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant custody bail to petitioner no.2 who failed to join the investigation despite earlier direction.
Petitioner No.2
Dharam Vir
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
