The High Court of Punjab & Haryana disposed of an anticipatory bail petition. Having previously granted interim bail subject to investigation, the Court made the bail absolute as the co-operating petitioner did not require custodial interrogation.
The interim bail granted earlier was made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
201
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-13597-2021 Date of decision: 14.10.2021
Satya Prakash Kashyap @ Sonu Mishra
Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present: Mr. Manvendra Mukul, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):
Due to COVID-19 situation, the Court is convened through video conference.
This petition is filed for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 640, dated 3rd August, 2020, under Section 365 read with Section 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Old Industrial, Panipat.
This Court vide order dated 7th April, 2021 granted the interim bail to the petitioner subject to joining investigation.
Learned State Counsel, on instructions from ASI Romesh, submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is co-operating.
As no custodial interrogation is needed, the interim bail granted on 7th April, 2021 is made absolute.
Disposed of accordingly.
[AVNEESH JHINGAN] JUDGE
14th October, 2021
�������������
PANKAJ BAWEJA 2021.10.14 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court, Chandigarh
Satya Prakash Kashyap @ Sonu Mishra
State of Haryana
AVNEESH JHINGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
