Shinder Pal Kaur v. State of U.T. Chandigarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The petition was withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. No substantive legal proposition or reasoning is available in this order.
The petition was withdrawn and disposed of accordingly. No substantive legal proposition or reasoning is available in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-13474 of 2021 Date of Decision: 27.04.2021
Shinder Pal Kaur
......Petitioner
Versus
UT and Ors.
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. Vishal Deep Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner. HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J
After arguing for some time, learned Counsel for the petitioner
prays for withdrawal of the present petition.
Disposed of as withdrawn.
April 27, 2021 manoj
(Harinder Singh Sidhu) Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2021.04.28 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Shinder Pal Kaur
UT and Ors.
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court