Court heard an application regarding interim bail conditions. The court observed that the petitioner complied with directions and cost deposit, finding no need to issue further orders regarding bail conditions.
No further directions issued; matter disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-13375 of 2021 Date of Decision: 20.09.2021
Jang Bahadur @ Jung Bahadur @ Jaggi
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present: Mr. Shakti Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Karanbir Singh, AAG, Punjab.
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of order dated 23.03.2021, the petitioner appeared before the learned trial Court and was admitted to interim bail. The petitioner has deposited the costs, as directed by this Court and has been regularly appearing before the trial Court.
In view thereof, no further directions are required to be issued.
Disposed of as such.
September 20, 2021 (Harinder Singh Sidhu) manoj Judge Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
MANOJ KUMAR 2021.09.21 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Jang Bahadur @ Jung Bahadur @ Jaggi
State of Punjab
Harinder Singh Sidhu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
